Situs Judi Slot Sbobet88 Gacor

sexuality, as opposed to encouraging healthy body approval.50
36. Complete nudity is antithetic to the elaborate semi-pornography of the fashion industry.
Julian Robinson observes, "modesty is so intertwined with sexual desire as well as the requirement for sexual display--


fighting but at exactly the same time re kindling this desire--a self-perpetuating process is inevitably set in motion. In
fact modesty can never actually achieve its ultimate end except through its disappearance.
modesty there are to be located many essential components of the sexual urge itself." 51
37. Clothes often focuses attention on the genitals and sexual arousal, rather than away from them. 52
At various times in Western history different parts of female anatomy have been eroticized: midriffs and
thighs in the Renaissance; buttocks, breasts, and thighs by the late 1800s (and comparatively diminutive midsections and
Abdomens). Panties layout has historically emphasized these erogenous body parts: corsets in the 1800s deemphasized
the midriff and underscored the breasts--using stuff including whalebone and steel; the crinoline in
the mid 1800s underscored the waist; and the bustle, appearing in 1868, accentuated the buttocks.53 Bathing suit
E.B. Hurlock writes: "When primitive folks are unaccustomed to wearing clothing, putting it on for the
first time will not decrease their immorality, as the women of missionary societies think it'll. It has merely the
Contrary effect. It attracts attention to the human body, particularly for those parts of it which are covered for the very first time." 54
Rob Boyte notes wryly that "cloth folks, when they do strip in front of others, usually do it for fire, and find
the bikini design tan-lines attractive.
Reveals how clothes designs become a fetish of the body." 55 Havelock Ellis writes: "In Case the conquest of sexual
Want were the first and last concern of life it'd be more sensible to forbid clothing than to prohibit
nakedness." 56
38. The fashion industry depends on the sex appeal of clothing.
Peter Fryer writes: "The changes in women's fashions are essentially determined by the demand to maintain
men's sexual interest, and consequently to transfer the main zone of lusty display once a given part of the body has
been saturated with attractive power to the stage of satiation. . . . https://s3.amazonaws.com/2-naturist/nudism-porn.html attempts to arouse interest in a new
erogenous zone to replace the zone which, for the time being, is played out." 57
39. Differences of clothes between the genders focus attention on sex differences.58
Psychologist J.C. Flugel writes: "There seems to be (particularly in modern life) no vital factor in the
nature, habits, or functions of the two sexes that would necessitate a striking difference of costume--other than the
desire to accentuate sex differences themselves; an accentuation that mainly serves the end of more readily and
Often arousing sexual desire." 59
40. https://s3.amazonaws.com/2-naturist/beach-porn.html believe that clothes may initially have developed, in part, as a means of
Concentrating sexual attention.60
41. Partial clothes is more sexually arousing (in generally unhealthy ways) than total nudity.
Anne Hollander writes: "The more important clothes is, the more significance attaches to its absence and the
more awareness is created about any connection between both states."
unquestionably https://s3.amazonaws.com/2-naturist/femdom-beach.html known fact that familiar things arouse no interest, while concealment adds enchantment and
stimulates curiosity . . . a cloaked body with just enough covering to indicate the outline, is much more alluring than a
Absolutely nude body." 62 And Lee Baxandall detects, "the 'nearly'-nude beaches, where bikinis and thongs are
paraded, are more sexually titillating than a clothes-optional resort or beach. What exactly is natural is more fulfilling,
though it may not fit the tantalize-and-deliver titillation of our consumer culture." 63
42. Modesty--especially enforced modesty--just adds to sexual attraction and want.64
Reena Glazer writes:
because they are publicly inaccessible; society additionally eroticizes the female breast by labeling it black to expose.
This element of the forbidden simply perpetuates the intense male reaction female exposure allegedly
inspires." 65
43. Topfree66 inequality (requiring women, but not men, to wear tops) creates an unhealthy fixation
44.
the encouragement of unneeded cosmetic surgery for breast augmentation, and avoidance of essential
breast examinations by women.